dev-lang/swift: fix broken 5.10.1 patch symlink

2849e1a7d removed swift-6.0.1, -6.0.1-r1, and -6.0.2, but
swift-5.10.1-r2/backtracing-noexecstack.patch was symlinked to
swift-6.0.1's version. The effective file has been moved down to
swift-5.10.1-r2 and the swift-6.x line now symlinks to this base file;
the contents have not changed.

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/954338
Signed-off-by: Itai Ferber <itai@itaiferber.net>
This commit is contained in:
Itai Ferber
2025-04-27 13:20:30 -04:00
parent ca780a0bb3
commit becab7e238
2 changed files with 16 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
../swift-6.0.1/backtracing-noexecstack.patch

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
# The Swift backtracer needs to get CPU context information when producing
# backtraces, which is necessarily written in assembly. Because it tries to be
# portable, it doesn't include a note indicating that the assembled binary
# doesn't require an executable stack; we need to include one explicitly to turn
# it off.
--- a/swift/stdlib/public/Backtracing/get-cpu-context.S
+++ b/swift/stdlib/public/Backtracing/get-cpu-context.S
@@ -140,3 +140,6 @@ FN(_swift_get_cpu_context):
bx lr
#endif
+#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__ELF__)
+.section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
+#endif

View File

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
# The Swift backtracer needs to get CPU context information when producing
# backtraces, which is necessarily written in assembly. Because it tries to be
# portable, it doesn't include a note indicating that the assembled binary
# doesn't require an executable stack; we need to include one explicitly to turn
# it off.
--- a/swift/stdlib/public/Backtracing/get-cpu-context.S
+++ b/swift/stdlib/public/Backtracing/get-cpu-context.S
@@ -140,3 +140,6 @@ FN(_swift_get_cpu_context):
bx lr
#endif
+#if defined(__linux__) && defined(__ELF__)
+.section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
+#endif

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
../swift-5.10.1-r2/backtracing-noexecstack.patch